The news in brief:
Usually liberal news outlet indulges in a spot of cyberbullying
Solar panels: you're doing it all wrong
Holy war declared against dogs?!
Religion’s bodycount continues to mount
Seriously - how hard is it to not kill people?
Fracking will save us all
Frivolous law suit
Wet grass’s inhumanity to dogs continues apace
Totally rad scientists promote fistbumping for all the wrong
reasons
Handshakes will kill us all (apparently)
BBC presenter surprises no-one
Basically the whole world is pretty hairy right now
Study states the obvious: dinosaurs might not have gone
extinct if all of the conditions had been totally different
Fracking will kill us all
Dragonfly is fucking huge!
Terrible human being forgets how to parent
Diana Watch 2014: pretty sure she’s still dead
Reading the news so
you don’t have to…
The news in brief
celebrity special:
BBC unveils news reality phone-in show (yawn)
Reality TV show gets totally needless spin-off
Man doesn’t like working with other man
Wild speculation
Celebrity’s love life is apparently our business
Woman looks undignified on bouncy castle
Woman updates social media
Paparazzi intrudes on family day out
Woman wears dress
Singer proud owner of legs
Woman wears t-shirt
Pregnant woman dresses appropriately for the weather
Nudes in brief: Toni Garrn
Woman wears bikini whilst on HOLIDAY
High street guru not that good at job
Diana Watch 2014: yup. still dead
Reading the ‘news’ so
you don’t have to….
A bonus blog post
from the archives:
Child abusers can send things to
each other through the post. Royal Mail should monitor all of our post and face
fines and legal action if anything gets through... wait that's crazy talk. So
why are ISPs and search engines facing this backwardness? Child abusers
wouldn't put their filth in a brown package labelled 'child abuse' and drop it
off at the post office. If it were me I'd bundle it in a stack of old comics and not label it at all. This applies
to the Internet too. These filth wizards aren't going to type 'Child abuse
images' into Bing (mostly because no-one uses Bing) They're going to save their
file names as meaningless alphanumeric chains and share them peer to peer
through a goddamned pottery chat room. Blocking search terms and stopping
perfectly legal pornography isn't going to do shit other than criminalise legitimate
researchers and make me tell Virgin Media when I fancy a quick knuckle shuffle
to some downstairs mixup. To stop child abuse on the Internet we need to go
offline and the police need to take out the sick fucks with the cameras. There
is a sad real world component to child abuse and by the time it's on the
Internet there's already a vulnerable human being scarred for life. Making Bing
and Google responsible means it's already too late.
Raving about the news
so you don’t have to…